Capstone (LDT400x)
Welcome to the course page! Explore the weekly sections for things I am learning along the way. Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or comments, always happy to connect!
WEEK 1
Minicourse Features & LMS Declaration
​
Minicourse Features:
My minicourse, Pottery Fundamentals, will provide learners with an accessible and structured entry point into pottery. At least four key features envisioned are:
​
-
Videos – Short, high-quality clips showing handbuilding, wheel throwing, and glazing basics to model core techniques.
-
Interactive Elements and Quizzes – interactive lectures with drag and drops, click and reveal like activities to support practice without grades (formative) and then Low-stakes graded checks for understanding on topics such as clay stages, glazing safety, and firing types, with immediate feedback that provide summative assessments data.
-
Reflection Journals – Learners will upload short reflections or photos of their practice, fostering self-assessment and deeper learning.
-
Discussion Forum/Peer Exchange – A space where learners can share questions, ideas, or images of their work, creating a supportive learning community.
​
​Instructional Design Document (IDD) page for background: here
​
LMS Selection:
After reviewing the options, I have selected TalentLMS as the platform for my minicourse. The reasons include:
​
-
Compatibility with modern tools and eLearning standard elemnts: TalentLMS supports SCORM packages (I already build a few units), H5P activities and Padlet boards via iframe embedding, etc, which allows me to integrate interactive and collaborative tools seamlessly.
-
Assessment flexibility: I can deliver graded quizzes inside TalentLMS for formal evaluation, while using other tools for more formative, exploratory activities.
-
User experience: Its clean, intuitive interface helps learners focus on pottery content rather than technical barriers. User friendly for instructors to create/modify content too.
​
Support Resources:
To ensure effective use of TalentLMS, I have identified the following support resources:
​
-
TalentLMS Help Center – https://help.talentlms.com: Step-by-step tutorials, FAQs, and guides to course setup, assignments, and assessments.
-
TalentLMS Customer Success Hub – https://www.talentlms.com/customer-success : A dedicated hub designed to support and guide new users as they build courses.
-
TalentLMS YouTube Channel – https://www.youtube.com/c/Talentlms-learning: Short video demos that walk-through feature setup, customization, and learner management.
-
TalentLMS Cheat Sheets – https://www.talentlms.com/cheatsheets/ : One-stop-shop quick references to maximize LMS functionality.
-
TalentLMS Blog – https://www.talentlms.com/blog/ : Regular updates, insights, and practical tips on instructional design and LMS use.
These resources will provide both quick answers and deeper guidance as I design my minicourse.
​

WEEK 2
Kirkpatrick Level 1
Instructional Design Document (IDD) page for background: here
​
Survey text:
​
Introduction to Survey
​
Thank you for taking Pottery Fundamentals!
Your feedback helps us improve and ensure the course meets learner needs. This short survey asks about your experience and alignment with the course outcomes, clarity, usefulness, engagement, relevance, and usability. Please respond honestly; your input directly guides future updates.
​
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs):
​
-
CLO1: Demonstrate proficiency in pottery-making techniques by creating functional and decorative pieces.
-
CLO2: Understand and describe key processes (shaping, glazing, firing).
-
CLO3: Assess and critique pottery work using technical/aesthetic criteria.
-
CLO4: Reflect on process and engage in constructive peer feedback to support collaborative learning.
Kirkpatrick Level 1 Survey Questions
​
Overall Course Experience
Likert scale (Strongly agree → Strongly disagree)
​
-
The course content felt relevant to my goals and interests as a beginner potter.
-
The video tutorials (e.g., clay & tools, stages of clay) were clear, paced appropriately, and easy to follow.
-
The interactive lessons helped me understand studio zones, tools, safety, and storage.
-
The asynchronous format and course organization made it easy to learn at my own pace without feeling overwhelmed.
-
The LMS experience (TalentLMS) - navigation, instructions, and access to materials-was user-friendly.
-
The mix of quizzes, interactives, sharing activities, and reflections kept me engaged.
-
I feel more confident to practice pottery techniques after this course.
-
The course prepared me to discuss/critique my own work and others’ work respectfully.
​
Helpfulness of Course Components
Likert scale (Very helpful → Not helpful at all)
​
How helpful was each component for your learning?
Scale: Very helpful → Not helpful at all
-
Video tutorials
-
Interactive lesson with practice activities
-
Assessment quizzes
-
Collaboration / peer feedback
-
Reflection journal
Multiple choice (single answer)
​
-
Which element was MOST helpful for your learning?
-
Video tutorials
-
Interactive lessons (text,flip cards, drag-and-drop, checks)
-
Quiz/Assessments
-
Collaboration wall / peer feedback
-
Reflection journal
​
Short answer / Open-ended
-
What did you find most valuable about this minicourse (content, format, resources, or activities)? (tie to what you actually used)
-
What one change would most improve your learning experience (e.g., pacing, scaffolding, examples, accessibility, tool guidance)?
-
If you recommend this course to a friend, what would you highlight as its biggest strength?
-
Did any part feel confusing or difficult (e.g., tool setup, steps in a technique, assignment directions)? Please specify.
-
Was there any content you felt was missing or should be expanded?
-
Do you have any other comments or suggestions for us?
​
Survey access
​
-
Location : Directly on TalentLMS.
-
Please log in using the following info:
-
Generic student login info:
-
Username: potteryfundamentalscourse@gmail.com
-
Password: UMGCmicromasters2025!
-
Look for the unit label as "Learner Satisfaction Survey (Kirkpatrick Level 1)"
​
Reflection
Creating this Kirkpatrick Level 1 survey helped me connect the course learning outcomes to learner reactions, ensuring that I measure not only satisfaction but also perceived relevance and clarity. By collecting both quantitative (Likert, multiple choice) and qualitative (open-ended) feedback, I can triangulate insights to identify strengths (e.g., engaging videos, supportive community features) and improvement areas (e.g., technical usability, pacing, scaffolding). One limitation I encountered was the restricted survey question types available in the LMS, for example, I had initially envisioned adding ranking-style questions to capture more nuanced comparisons. Despite this, the data gathered will still allow me to refine course elements, adjust activity design, and continuously enhance learner engagement. Over time, systematic use of Level 1 surveys will foster a learner-centered approach, ensuring the minicourse remains responsive, practical, and aligned with learner needs.​​

WEEK 3
Kirkpatrick Level 2
Instructional Design Document (IDD) page for background: here​​​​​
​
Selected Module: Glazing and Firing Basics
-
Aligned CLO(s):
-
CLO2: Understand and describe the key processes involved in pottery-making, including shaping, glazing, and firing.
-
​CLO3: Apply safe and effective techniques in the studio to support skill development and responsible practice.
-
-
Aligned Learning Objectives:
-
LO3: Demonstrate the application of at least two different decorative glazing techniques.
-
LO4: Describe the key steps involved in the firing process.
-
LO11: Apply safety and cleaning practices that support a healthy studio environment and responsible pottery practice.
-
-
Learning Materials & Activities:
-
Learners review video lessons demonstrating glaze application techniques (dip, brush, sponge).
-
Learners review an infographic and guided content on the firing process.
-
Learners complete a practice-based activity to test glaze application.
-
Learners reflect on safety and studio practices through discussion prompts.
-
​
Instructional Design Document (IDD) page for background: here
​
Assessment text:
Instructions for Learners:
You will have 15 minutes to complete the assessment, which consists of 10 questions in total. Each question is worth 1 point, for a maximum of 10 points, and a passing score is set at 70% (7 out of 10). You may attempt the assessment as many times as needed until mastery is achieved. The quiz is mobile-friendly and can be taken on both desktop and mobile devices. Feedback will be provided offering guidance and remediation to support your learning.
​
Questions:
​
1. Multiple Choice. Which glazing technique involves immersing the entire piece in glaze?
-
A) Brushing
-
B) Dipping
-
C) Sponging
-
D) Spraying
Feedback: Dipping coats the entire piece evenly in one motion.
​​​
2. True/False. It is safe to load greenware (unfired clay) directly into a glaze firing.
-
True
-
False
Feedback: Exactly! Greenware must first be bisque-fired before glazing. Greenware will crack or explode if glaze-fired.​
​
3. Fill-in-the-Blank. The first ________stage in pottery is called the ________ firing.
Correct: Firing / Bisque.
Feedback: Bisque firing hardens clay while keeping it porous for glaze. It’s the stage before glaze firing.
​
4. Matching. Match the firing stage with its description:
Bisque -Hardens clay but leaves it porous
Glaze - Vitrifies glaze into a glassy coating
Feedback: Well done! You’ve matched firing stages with their correct purposes. Remember: bisque firing hardens clay for glazing; glaze firing transforms glaze into a glassy surface.
​
5. Multiple Choice Which safety precaution is recommended when handling glaze materials?
-
A) Eating snacks in the studio
-
B) Washing hands thoroughly after use
-
C) Leaving glaze spills and splashes uncleaned in the studio
-
D) Using the same sponge/brush for different glazes without cleaning
Feedback: That’s right! Washing hands reduces the risk of accidentally ingesting glaze chemicals. The key precaution is to always wash your hands after handling glaze to avoid exposure.
​
6. Short Answer. Briefly describe one challenge that can occur during glaze firing and how to troubleshoot it.
Feedback: Good reflection. Expected responses were along the lines of crawling, pinholes, blistering, glaze running, cracking, or warping. Troubleshooting could include adjusting glaze thickness, ensuring proper bisque firing, or cleaning surfaces before glazing. Review the troubleshooting activity for more details.
​
7. Multiple Choice. Which of the following is not a glazing method covered in this module?
-
A) Mishima
-
B) Dipping
-
C) Brushing
-
D) Sponging
Feedback: Mishima is a decorative inlay technique, not one of the glazing basics here.
​
8. True/False. A kiln must always be vented properly during the firing process.
-
True
-
False
Feedback: Proper ventilation is essential for safety and even firing. Proper ventilation prevents harmful fumes and uneven heating. Always vent your kiln.​
​
9. Matching. Match each glazing effect with its correct description:
-
Glossy glaze - Produces a shiny, reflective surface
-
Matte glaze - Produces a soft, non-reflective finish
-
Transparent glaze - Shows clay body or underglaze beneath
-
Opaque glaze - Covers surface completely, hiding underlying detail
Feedback:
Good work! Glossy glazes create shine, matte glazes dull the surface, transparent glazes reveal layers beneath, and opaque glazes provide full coverage. Review the glazing finishes lesson for more examples.​
​
10. Put the steps of the glaze firing process in the correct order:
-
Apply glaze to bisque-fired piece
-
Allow glaze to dry completely
-
Load glazed pieces into kiln with proper spacing
-
Heat kiln gradually to target temperature (1000–1300°C)
-
Cool kiln slowly before unloading
Feedback: Correct! Glazing requires bisque ware first, then glaze application, drying, proper kiln loading, controlled heating, and finally slow cooling. This ensures even coverage and minimizes cracking or defects.
Incorrect: Review the firing sequence lesson to revisit why drying and proper kiln loading are critical steps.
​​
Messages
​
-
If passed: Congratulations! You passed this assessment and demonstrated a solid understanding of the module’s key pottery concepts regarding glazing and firing. Keep practicing your skills, and use the feedback provided to refine your technique even further. Great work moving closer to mastering pottery fundamentals!
-
You didn’t pass this time, but don’t worry, learning pottery takes patience and practice. Review the feedback provided, revisit the interactive lessons, and try again. Each attempt helps you build confidence and strengthen your skills.
​
Assessment access
​
-
Location : Directly on TalentLMS.
-
Please log in using the following info:
-
Generic student login info:
-
Username: potteryfundamentalscourse@gmail.com
-
Password: UMGCmicromasters2025!
-
​​
Look for the unit label as "Glazing & Firing Basics Assessment (Kirkpatrick Level 2)"
Reflection
Creating this Kirkpatrick Level 2 assessment helped me ensure that quiz questions directly measure whether learners achieved the targeted learning objectives from the Glazing and Firing Basics module. I aligned each CLO and LO with appropriate question types (e.g., multiple choice or ordering for recall, short answer for troubleshooting, matching for process steps) to assess both knowledge and application.
I included a mix of formats (multiple choice, true/false, fill-in-the-blank, matching, and orderin) to engage different cognitive levels. A challenge was balancing variety within the LMS, but I kept the quiz practical and accessible.
A key limitation was TalentLMS’s constraints: fill-in-the-blank questions required at least two fields, and the platform does not support more advanced interactive types (like drag-and-drop ranking or hotspot identification). In addition, feedback is only tied to each answer option, meaning I can provide tailored feedback per choice, but not simultaneous generic “correct” and “incorrect” messages.
Despite these constraints, the assessment generates actionable data to guide refinements. It will help me see whether learners are gaining not just confidence but also accurate technical knowledge. For example, if many learners miss Q6 on troubleshooting, I could strengthen that section with additional examples or practice. Over time, this feedback will help ensure stronger alignment between practice activities and evaluations, keeping the course responsive to learner needs.
​
​

WEEK 4
Discussion & Assignment Prompts
Instructional Design Document (IDD) page for background: here
​
Selected Module: Glazing and Firing Basics
-
Aligned CLO(s):
-
CLO2: Understand and describe the key processes involved in pottery-making, including shaping, glazing, and firing.
-
-
Aligned Learning Objectives:
-
LO3: Demonstrate the application of at least two different decorative glazing techniques.
-
LO4: Describe the key steps involved in the firing process.
-
LO11: Apply safety and cleaning practices that support a healthy studio environment and responsible pottery practice.
-
-
Learning Materials & Activities:
-
Learners review video lessons demonstrating glaze application techniques (dip, brush, sponge).
-
Learners review an infographic and guided content on the firing process.
-
Learners complete a practice-based activity to test glaze application.
-
Learners reflect on safety and studio practices through discussion prompts.
-
​
Instructional Design Document (IDD) page for background: here
​
Discussion Prompts
​
Discussion 1 – “Troubleshooting Together: Glaze Firing Issues”
​
-
Linked LO: LO4 (firing process), LO3 (glazing techniques).
-
Prompt: Think back to your experience or observations of glaze firings. What are some common problems you’ve seen (such as crawling, pinholes, glaze running, cracking, or warping)? Share one example and suggest how you would troubleshoot or prevent this issue in the future.
-
Participation Requirements:
-
Click on the blue “+” button in the lower right corner to create your post.
-
Write your initial response (150–200 words).
-
Reply to at least one peer by offering additional insights, tips, or alternative approaches. You can just provide constructive feedback as an alternative.
-
​​​
Discussion 2 – “Studio Safety and Glazing Habits”
-
Linked LO: LO11 (safety and cleaning).
-
Prompt: Safe studio habits are just as important as artistic skills. Reflect on one safety practice you’ve adopted (or plan to adopt) when handling glaze materials or loading kilns. Why is this practice important, and what risks might occur if it’s ignored?
-
Participation Requirements:
-
Click on the blue “+” button in the lower right corner to create your post.
-
Write your initial response (150–200 words).
-
Reply to at least one peer, commenting on how their safety habit connects to your own practice. Or just provide constructive feedback.
-
Motivational quote to add in both boards: Let’s discuss, share, and learn together by posting our insights and supporting one another’s growth as potters.
​
Rubric Reminder to add in the LMS:
You can review the rubric by clicking this text or by accessing it directly in the next unit. Feel free to return to it at any time to check the criteria in more detail. Before submitting your work, make sure your assignment aligns with the rubric and grading criteria. This will help you confirm that all required elements are included and that your work meets expectations.
​​​
Assignment Prompt
​
Assignment Title: Glazing Process Showcase
Linked LO: LO3 (apply glazing techniques), LO4 (describe firing process).
​
Description:
You will demonstrate one glazing technique of your choice (dip, brush, sponge – with optional decorative add-ons), document the process, and reflect on your experience. The goal is to connect hands-on practice with thoughtful reflection, while allowing you to share your work in a format that feels natural to you.
​
Instructions:
​
1.Select one glazing method (dip, brush, sponge) and apply it to a bisque-fired piece.
2. Document your process by including:
-
Before firing: at least one photo of the glazed but unfired piece.
-
After firing: at least one photo of the finished piece.
-
Optional: a short video link (e.g., YouTube, Vimeo, or Google Drive) showing part of your process.
3. Write or record your reflection (200–300 words if written, or 2–3 minutes if audio/video). Your reflection should explain:
-
Why you chose this glazing method.
-
Challenges you faced and how you addressed them.
-
How the outcome compares to your expectations.
4. Compile all components (photos, reflection, and optional video link) into a single file. If you are submitting audio/video reflection, include a short transcript in the file for accessibility.
​
Submission Guidelines:
-
Compile all components (photos, reflection, and optional video link) into one file only.
-
Accepted formats: DOC, DOCX, PDF, PPT, PPTX, XLS, XLSX (max size: 200 MB) OR ZIP if you prefer to compress multiple items together (max size: 600 MB).
-
Upload your file using the Upload a file option in TalentLMS.
-
Deadline: End of the course.
Access
​
-
Location : Directly on TalentLMS
-
Please log in using the following info:
-
Generic student login info:
-
Username: potteryfundamentalscourse@gmail.com
-
Password: UMGCmicromasters2025!
-
​​
Look for the unit label as "Assignment: Glazing Process Showcase", "Discussion Studio Safety and Glazing Habits" and "Discussion Troubleshooting Together: Glaze Firing Issues".
​
Reflection
Creating these discussion and assignment prompts reinforced the importance of aligning activities directly with learning objectives. For the discussions, I designed prompts that encourage troubleshooting and peer-to-peer reflections on safety, since these both strengthen technical skills and foster a sense of community. For the assignment, I aimed to connect hands-on practice with reflective writing and visual evidence, making the outcome more authentic and personally meaningful.
​
One challenge was balancing clarity with creativity - keeping prompts structured enough to guide learners, yet open enough to invite personal experiences. Another limitation was that TalentLMS offers relatively simple discussion and assignment features, which restricted my ability to integrate rich multimedia or tiered responses. To address this, I used Padlet to host the discussions and embedded them via iframe, providing a more dynamic and interactive space.
​
By reviewing learner responses and submissions, I will be able to identify common misconceptions (e.g., glaze thickness, safety habits) and refine future modules to better support skill development and studio best practices.
​

WEEK 5
Discussion & Assignment Rubrics
Instructional Design Document (IDD) page for background: here
​
Rubric 1: Discussion – Troubleshooting Glaze Firing Issues
Prompt for reference:
Think back to your experience or observations of glaze firings. What are some common problems you’ve seen (such as crawling, pinholes, glaze running, cracking, or warping)? Share one example and suggest how you would troubleshoot or prevent this issue in the future.
​
Participation Requirements:
-
Click on the blue “+” button in the lower right corner to create your post.
-
Write your initial response (150–200 words).
-
Reply to at least one peer by offering additional insights, tips, or alternative approaches. You can just provide constructive feedback as an alternative.
​​​
Criteria & Weights
-
Knowledge & Relevance (35%): Contribution shows accurate understanding of glaze firing issues and directly relates to the discussion topic.
-
Critical Thinking & Application (35%): Response demonstrates reasoning, draws connections to course materials, or offers practical troubleshooting strategies.
-
Engagement & Peer Response (20%): Actively engages with at least one peer, adding constructive feedback or new insights.
-
Clarity & Writing Mechanics (10%): Posts are clear, well-organized, and free of major errors.
Levels of Performance (4-point scale):
-
Exemplary (4)
-
Proficient (3)
-
Developing (2)
-
Needs Improvement (1)
​
Check rubric to see descriptors and calculations: Download here
​
​
Rubric 2: Assignment – Glazing Process Reflection & Photo Submission
​
Prompt for reference:
​
Description:
You will demonstrate one glazing technique of your choice (dip, brush, sponge – with optional decorative add-ons), document the process, and reflect on your experience. The goal is to connect hands-on practice with thoughtful reflection, while allowing you to share your work in a format that feels natural to you.
​
Instructions:
​
1.Select one glazing method (dip, brush, sponge) and apply it to a bisque-fired piece.
2. Document your process by including:
-
Before firing: at least one photo of the glazed but unfired piece.
-
After firing: at least one photo of the finished piece.
-
Optional: a short video link (e.g., YouTube, Vimeo, or Google Drive) showing part of your process.
3. Write or record your reflection (200–300 words if written, or 2–3 minutes if audio/video). Your reflection should explain:
-
Why you chose this glazing method.
-
Challenges you faced and how you addressed them.
-
How the outcome compares to your expectations.
4. Compile all components (photos, reflection, and optional video link) into a single file. If you are submitting audio/video reflection, include a short transcript in the file for accessibility.
​
Submission Guidelines:
-
Compile all components (photos, reflection, and optional video link) into one file only.
-
Accepted formats: DOC, DOCX, PDF, PPT, PPTX, XLS, XLSX (max size: 200 MB) OR ZIP if you prefer to compress multiple items together (max size: 600 MB).
-
Upload your file using the Upload a file option in TalentLMS.
-
Deadline: End of the course.
​
Criteria & Weights
​
-
Documentation of Process (25%): Includes required before & after photos, and optional video if chosen.
-
Reflection & Analysis (30%): Explains choice of technique, challenges faced, and comparison of outcome to expectations.
-
Application of Technique (25%): Demonstrates appropriate application of glazing method, with visible effort and care.
-
Organization & Clarity (10%): Submission is complete, clearly structured, and easy to follow (includes transcript if using audio/video).
-
Submission Format & Guidelines (10%): All components are compiled in a single file (PDF/DOCX/PPT/XLS/ZIP), submitted on time.
Levels of Performance (4-point scale):
-
Exemplary (4)
-
Proficient (3)
-
Developing (2)
-
Needs Improvement (1)
​
Check rubric to see descriptors and calculations: Download here
​
Access
​
-
Location : Directly on TalentLMS
-
Please log in using the following info:
-
Generic student login info:
-
Username: potteryfundamentalscourse@gmail.com
-
Password: UMGCmicromasters2025!
-
Look for the unit label as "Rubric for Discussion: Troubleshooting Together: Glaze Firing Issues" and "Rubric for Assignment: Glazing Process Showcase"
Reflection
Creating these rubrics reinforced the value of making evaluation criteria explicit and aligned with both CLOs and LOs. For the discussion, I prioritized community, peer-to-peer learning, and troubleshooting, while keeping expectations broad and accessible. For the assignment, I focused on blending technical skill evidence (photos/videos) with reflective practice, so learners demonstrate both process and thinking.
One challenge was balancing detail with usability, since too many criteria can overwhelm students. Another limitation is that TalentLMS does not have a strong built-in rubric tool, so I provided these rubrics as PDFs guides alongside the activities. By reviewing rubric-based feedback, I can track patterns (such as recurring safety issues or common glazing challenges) and refine future lessons, adjust assessment criteria and supports (scaffold) to continually improve the course and the learning experience.
​

WEEK 6
Learning Theory/ID Models & Opening Presentation
Reflection on Learning Theory
​
-
Which learning theory (or theories) did you find most influential in shaping the design and objectives of your minicourse, and how did it guide your decisions regarding content, activities, and assessments? Update your IDD as necessary to reflect any shifts in your thinking and application of learning theory.
​​
-
Reflecting on the development of your minicourse, how did integrating principles from a specific learning theory enhance the learning experience for your target audience? Can you provide examples of how this theory influenced the instructional strategies or technologies you chose to use?
​
For my pottery minicourse, the most influential theories have been Constructivism, Experiential Learning, and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), reinforced by andragogy and Mayer’s Multimedia Learning and behaviorist principles. Pottery is inherently experiential: learners work with clay, reflect on results, conceptualize improvements, and try again, following Kolb’s cycle. This guided my design of practice-reflect-practice activities, such as glazing documentation paired with written or audio reflection.
Constructivism shaped my choice to include peer discussions and troubleshooting forums, where learners co-construct knowledge by sharing glaze firing issues, comparing solutions, and learning from diverse experiences. SDT was equally influential, as giving learners choices (e.g., glazing methods) supports autonomy, while rubrics build competence and discussion boards create relatedness.
Another very influential theory overall has been andragogy, since my target audience is adult beginners. I wanted to give learners choice and ownership, recognizing their prior experiences and focusing on practical, relevant applications. This guided my decision to use open-ended reflection prompts and flexible microlearning activities (e.g., photo documentation of glazing experiments), helping learners connect course content to their own studio contexts.
Finally, behaviorist principles informed the design of knowledge checks and rubrics. By providing immediate feedback and clear performance criteria, learners are motivated to refine techniques before progressing.
Integrating these theories enhanced the experience by balancing structure and autonomy. Padlet boards provide social collaboration (constructivism), while rubrics and structured tasks maintain clarity of expectations (behaviorism). This combination fosters an engaging, supportive learning environment that respects adult learners while building confidence in pottery skills.
Other frameworks such as microlearning, ARCS, and Gagné’s Nine Events also supported the design in more targeted ways: microlearning guided the use of bite-sized tutorials, ARCS helped keep motivation in focus, and Gagné’s Events offered structure for introducing and sequencing pottery techniques.
​
Reflection on Instructional Design Models
​
- Which instructional design model did you primarily follow in the development of your minicourse, and how did its specific phases or components influence the structure, content, and delivery methods of your course? Update your IDD as necessary to reflect any shifts in your thinking and application of instructional design models.
​​
- Considering the instructional design model you applied, what were the most significant challenges and benefits you encountered in aligning your course design with this model? How did this model facilitate or hinder your ability to meet your learning objectives and address the needs of your learners?
​
​
The primary model guiding my minicourse design has been the Successive Approximation Model (SAM), supported by Rapid Instructional Design (RID), with supplementary elements from ADDIE and Understanding by Design (UbD). Pottery is a hands-on subject where learners encounter unique challenges, so SAM’s iterative approach helped me prototype activities with peers, gather informal feedback, and refine elements such as glazing reflections or troubleshooting forums. RID complemented this by enabling the efficient production of microlearning pieces, keeping the course agile and adaptable to learner needs.
At the same time, I needed to balance speed with structure. Here, UbD provided the backward design lens to anchor all activities and assessments to the course learning outcomes (CLOs). For example, the assignment requiring before-and-after glazing documentation was directly mapped to CLOs on applying techniques and reflecting on outcomes. Similarly, ADDIE’s Evaluation phase has been essential for planning how to measure success post-delivery, using rubrics and learner feedback to guide future iterations.
The biggest challenge was weaving these models together without making the design feel fragmented. SAM and RID sometimes felt too open-ended on their own, but UbD and ADDIE grounded the course by keeping outcomes and evaluation in focus. This hybrid approach provided flexibility for creative, learner-driven activities while maintaining accountability to clear goals and performance standards. Ultimately, the models worked in harmony to ensure my pottery minicourse is both practical and responsive while remaining aligned with its intended learning objectives.
​
Opening Presentation Screencast
​
-
Create a 2 - 3 minute opening presentation screencast for one of the modules/units/lessons in your minicourse. We recommend you use the screencast you create in your actual minicourse to maximize your time and efficiency.
-
In your screencast, include 1 - 2 examples of course content that connect the learner to the upcoming work. Examples include showing where they'll review a video and then need to answer questions based on the video.
-
Highlight engagement strategies in your content that will help ensure your learners are eager to go through the content.
-
Include closed captioning or a transcription file to be inclusive of all learners.
​
​
​​Glazing and Firing Basis - Module Overview
​
Purpose: Set the stage, outline objectives, highlight why it matters, and give learners a roadmap.
​
Text in platform:
Welcome to the Glazing & Firing Basics module!
In this part of the course, you’ll move beyond shaping clay and dive into the steps that give pottery its final character: glazing and firing.
This stage is where your creativity and technical skills come together. Glaze not only adds color and texture but also protects your piece and makes it functional. While glazing and firing can feel intimidating at first, mastering the basics is essential. Too much glaze may cause bubbling, too little can leave your piece looking unfinished, and firing mistakes can lead to cracks. This module will guide you through these challenges and help you troubleshoot with confidence.
As you progress, keep a bisque-fired piece nearby. You’ll use it to test a glazing method of your choice and reflect on how the results compare to your expectations. Think of it as your own mini-experiment!
​Learning Objectives
By the end of this module, you will be able to:
-
LO3: Apply glazing techniques to a bisque-fired piece.
-
LO4: Describe the firing process and identify common issues that may occur.
​
Cross-cutting objectives supported in this module:
-
LO5: Analyze common challenges in pottery (e.g., cracking, warping, glaze defects) and apply troubleshooting techniques.
-
LO6: Evaluate peers' pottery work and provide constructive critiques.
-
LO7: Reflect on your pottery-making experience and identify areas for improvement.
-
LO8 : Present your pottery projects, explaining the process, challenges, and techniques used.
What You’ll Do
-
Watch & Learn: Interactive lesson with short video tutorials on glazing methods and firing procedures.
-
Practice: Apply one glazing method to a piece of your own.
-
Discuss: Join the troubleshooting forum to share common glaze firing issues and how to solve them.
-
Reflect & Submit: Upload before-and-after photos of your glazed piece with a short reflection.
​
Screencast Script Outline (2–3 min)
Slide 1 – Title: Glazing & Firing Basics
“Welcome to the Glazing & Firing Basics module! In this part of the course, we’ll explore how glaze transforms your pottery — taking a simple clay piece and turning it into something vibrant, durable, and functional.”
​
Slide 2 & 3 – Learning Objectives
“By the end of this module, you’ll be able to apply glazing techniques to a bisque-fired piece and describe the firing process, including common issues that may occur. You’ll also build broader skills — like troubleshooting pottery challenges, giving and receiving peer feedback, reflecting on your own progress, and presenting your finished work. These cross-cutting objectives support your growth not just as a maker, but as part of a learning community”
​
Slide 3 – Why It Matters
“This stage is often the most exciting — but also the most unpredictable. Too much glaze, and it may bubble or run. Too little, and it looks unfinished. Understanding how glazing and firing work will help you anticipate results and troubleshoot more confidently.”
​
Slide 4 – What You’ll Do (talking over the LMS page)
“In this module, you’ll start with an interactive lecture on glazing and firing basics. You’ll move through short video tutorials, process cards, and quick reflection questions or quizzes to check your understanding.
Next, you’ll complete a featured assignment where you apply one glazing method to a bisque-fired piece and showcase your results. Clear instructions and a rubric will guide you, and you’ll submit your work using the upload feature.
You’ll also join two discussion forums — one for troubleshooting glaze and firing issues, and another for sharing and giving feedback on each other’s safety and glazing habits using our interactive board.
Finally, you’ll complete a short assessment to test your knowledge and confirm you’re ready to move on to the next stage of the course.”
​​
Slide 5 – Encouragement
“Remember, every firing is a learning opportunity. Even unexpected results teach you something new about the process. So approach this module as both practice and experimentation — and have fun with it. Let’s dive in!”
​
Power point file: here
SRT file: here
​Video file: https://youtu.be/BpK6FYv_H50
​​​
Access
​
-
Location : Directly on TalentLMS
-
Please log in using the following info:
-
Generic student login info:
-
Username: potteryfundamentalscourse@gmail.com
-
Password: UMGCmicromasters2025!
-
Look for the unit label as "Introduction - Module Overview"​
​
​
​

WEEK 7
Minicourse Syllabus
Access
Please download syllabus here.
​
Also available in the LMS:​ https://darosan.talentlms.com/plus/login
Generic student login info:
-
Username: potteryfundamentalscourse@gmail.com
-
Password: UMGCmicromasters2025!
Look for the unit label as "Pottery Fundamentals Syllabus"
​
Syllabus Text
​
​Pottery Fundamentals Syllabus
​
1. Pottery Fundamentals Course Description
A course for beginners designed to teach essential pottery skills, including wheel-throwing, handbuilding, glazing, and firing. Delivered fully online in an asynchronous format, the course allows learners to engage with materials at their own pace while still having access to tutoring hours for individual support. Learners will master the foundational techniques of pottery and develop the confidence to create both functional and decorative pieces.
The course emphasizes learning by doing through interactive lessons, short video tutorials, hands-on projects, and peer collaboration. Content is delivered in small, bite-sized segments, making it easier to practice, reflect, and build skills progressively without feeling overwhelmed. Through this approach, learners will develop proficiency in pottery-making, troubleshoot common challenges, and present finished pottery pieces that reflect both technical mastery and creative expression.
Format: Online, Self-Paced Asynchronous
2. Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)
By the end of this course, learners will be able to:
-
CLO1: Demonstrate proficiency in pottery-making techniques by creating functional and decorative pottery pieces.
-
CLO2: Understand and describe the key processes involved in pottery-making, including shaping, glazing, and firing.
-
CLO3: Develop ability to assess and critique pottery work using technical and aesthetic criteria.
-
CLO4: Reflect on the pottery-making process and engage in constructive peer feedback to support collaborative learning.
3. Course Structure and Schedule (Modules & Learning Objectives)
The course is organized into four main modules, supported by a supplementary microlearning video repository. Each module integrates interactive lessons, practical projects, discussions, and reflection opportunities. Cross-cutting objectives (troubleshooting, peer feedback, reflection, and presentation) are embedded throughout.
The course concludes with a final project.
Commitment per week: 4–7 hours of work
Total weeks: 10
Week 1-2.
Module 1: Introduction to Pottery (Basic Concepts)
Topics: Clay bodies, tools, studio setup, safety practices, and pottery terminology.
Learning Objectives:
-
Identify common clay types and their properties.
-
Recognize and describe essential studio tools and areas.
-
Apply safety and cleaning practices in the pottery studio.
Week 3-4.
Module 2: Handbuilding Techniques
Topics: Pinch, coil, and slab building.
Learning Objectives:
-
Apply pinch, coil, and slab techniques to create functional and decorative pottery.
Week 5-6.
Module 3: Wheel Throwing (Introductory Level)
Topics: Centering, throwing, trimming, and shaping basic forms.
Learning Objectives:
-
Demonstrate centering clay on the wheel.
-
Create a symmetrical bowl using wheel-throwing techniques.
Week 7-8.
Module 4: Glazing & Firing Basics
Topics: Decorative glazing methods, firing stages (bisque, glaze firing).
Learning Objectives:
-
Apply at least two decorative glazing techniques.
-
Describe the key steps in the firing process.
Week 9-10.
Final Project. Pottery Showcase
Topics: Presentation and reflection on a completed pottery piece.
Learning Objectives:
-
Present one completed pottery project, explaining the techniques, challenges, and creative process.
-
Reflect on personal growth and learning journey throughout the course.
-
Apply peer feedback and self-assessment to refine presentation and articulation skills.
In this final week, learners will bring together all the skills and knowledge developed across the course. Each learner will select one complete pottery piece they have created, prepare clear images or a short video presentation, and submit it along with a reflection on their creative process. The showcase emphasizes both technical mastery and personal expression. Learners will also engage with peers by providing constructive feedback on their showcased projects. This culminating activity serves as both a celebration of learning and an authentic assessment of pottery proficiency, synthesizing all skills learned across the modules.
Other details:
Cross-Cutting Objectives (integrated across Modules 1–4):
-
Analyze common challenges (e.g., cracks, warping, glaze defects) and apply troubleshooting strategies.
-
Evaluate peers’ work and provide constructive feedback.
-
Reflect on personal progress through journals or video reflections.
-
Present completed pottery projects, explaining techniques, challenges, and creative decisions.
Supplementary Resource: Microlearning Video Repository
-
Searchable video tutorials by skill level (e.g., trimming, underglaze, Sgraffito).
-
Flexible support tool learners can return to at any stage.
4. Instructor Contact
Instructor: Davinia Rodriguez Santos
Phone: +1 (202) 867-8098
Email: darosandesigns@gmail.com
Website: www.daviniarosan.com
Availability: email answers within 48 hours, tutoring office hours upon request
5. Course Prerequisites
-
No prior pottery experience is required.
-
Access to basic pottery tools and materials.
-
Ability to engage in physical work independently or collaborate with a local studio.
-
Intermediate to advanced English proficiency for understanding instructions and participating in discussions.
-
Basic computer literacy skills for navigating the online platform and uploading assignments.
6. Technology Requirements
-
A device with a stable internet connection for accessing the course platform and streaming content.
-
A camera or smartphone to record or photograph pottery pieces.
-
The ability to upload images, videos, and documents of your work to the course platform.
-
An active email account for course communications.
7. Grading Policy and Rubrics
Modules work (80% total)
Each module (Modules 1–4) contributes 20% to the final course grade. Within each module, performance will be evaluated using the following breakdown:
​
Component and Weight
-
Reflections & Peer Feedback 30%
-
Featured Assignments 40%
-
Summative Assessment 30%
All modules include a mix of interactive lessons, reflection activities, peer engagement, assignments, and knowledge checks. The grading structure ensures that learners are assessed consistently across modules while building cumulative skills toward the final pottery showcase.
Detailed rubrics for all these activities are provided within the online course platform alongside each activity. Please review these before starting your work to ensure alignment with expectations.
​
Final Pottery Showcase (20% total):
In this culminating activity, you’ll present one completed pottery piece along with a short reflection on your creative process. Your work will be evaluated on creativity and design, technical skill, articulation of process, and presentation. Think of this as your opportunity to celebrate your progress and showcase both your craftsmanship and your learning journey.
To give you a sense of expectations for this culminating activity, the rubric for the Final Pottery Showcase is included below:
​
​​​​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
Grade Scale:
-
A = 90–100%
-
B = 80–89%
-
C = 70–79%
-
D = 60–69%
-
F = Below 60%
8. Late Policies
-
Assignments are due bi-weekly on Thursdays by 11:59 p.m. EST.
-
Late submissions are not accepted unless prior approval has been granted.
-
Extension requests should be submitted with supporting documentation at least 24 hours before the deadline, whenever possible.
-
Please note that several activities involve peer review. Timely submissions are essential to ensure your peers receive feedback promptly.
9. Academic Honesty / Integrity Policy
-
All submitted work must be your own and completed independently, unless collaboration is explicitly permitted.
-
Proper citation and referencing of sources is required in all written or multimedia work.
-
Plagiarism, misattribution, or presenting others’ work as your own will result in loss of credit.
-
Peer feedback must always be constructive and respectful.
-
Students are expected to report suspected academic integrity violations to the instructor.
-
Use of AI tools is permitted as a source of support and inspiration; however, learners are expected to apply their own critical thinking and ensure originality in their final submissions.
10. Accommodations for Students with Disabilities
This course is designed with accessibility in mind. Transcripts, captions, alternative text formats, and screen reader–compatible materials are provided to support diverse learning needs.
If you require additional accommodations or have accessibility concerns, please contact the instructor as soon as possible so that appropriate arrangements can be made.
11. PDF Version Available
A downloadable PDF version of this syllabus is available from the course site.
​


WEEK 8
Evaluating Online Courses & Final Presentation
Course Self-Evaluation Using OSCQR Standards
1. Course Overview & Information
Strengths:
-
Clear syllabus provided with course description, learning outcomes, grading, and policies.
-
Course structure (4 modules + microlearning repository) is transparent and easy to follow.
-
Asynchronous design is clearly stated, with peer engagement features (forums, showcase).
Areas to Improve:
-
Could add a brief “Welcome / Start Here” page or orientation video to walk new learners through navigation.
-
Clarify expected weekly workload in hours (helps learners plan better).
2. Learning Objectives (CLOs & LOs)
Strengths:
-
CLOs are measurable and aligned with module-level objectives.
-
Cross-cutting skills (reflection, peer feedback, presentation, troubleshooting) are embedded across modules, which aligns with best practice.
-
Objectives are written in learner-friendly language (“By the end of this module, you will…”).
Areas to Improve:
-
Some LOs could be even more specific (e.g., LO3 “apply decorative glazing techniques” -> specify “at least two” decorative methods).
-
Consider including Bloom’s Taxonomy verbs consistently (e.g., “analyze,” “evaluate”) for higher-order objectives.
3. Assessment & Measurement
Strengths:
-
Grading policy is transparent (modules + showcase, weights clearly listed).
-
Rubrics provided (Final Showcase rubric + note that all others are in platform).
-
Mix of formative (reflections, peer feedback, knowledge checks) and summative (module assessments + final showcase).
Areas to Improve:
-
Could add examples of what “excellent” vs “satisfactory” work looks like in some assignments (model submissions).
-
Ensure automated quizzes provide immediate feedback, not just scores.
4. Instructional Materials
Strengths:
-
Combination of text, images, videos, infographics, and interactive elements (cards, quizzes, etc.) supports different learning styles.
-
Supplementary microlearning repository allows for flexible, just-in-time learning.
Areas to Improve:
-
Add more references to external resources (OERs, pottery websites, tutorials) for learners who want to deepen skills.
-
Ensure all images/videos have descriptive alt-text for accessibility.
5. Learner Interaction & Engagement
Strengths:
-
Two discussion forums per module encourage collaboration.
-
Reflection journals and video reflections encourage self-assessment.
-
Final Showcase allows learners to celebrate progress and receive peer/instructor validation.
Areas to Improve:
-
Could incorporate optional “peer groups” (small cohorts) to strengthen community if the platform allows.
-
Encourage peer responses by setting a minimum requirement (e.g., respond to 2 peers).
6. Course Technology & Support
Strengths:
-
Requirements are clear (device, internet, camera, upload capacity, email).
-
Use of asynchronous discussion boards and file uploads is simple and accessible.
Areas to Improve:
-
Consider adding quick “how-to” guides for key platform features (e.g., uploading assignments, using the discussion board).
-
Provide troubleshooting contact info beyond the instructor (e.g., tech support email for LMS?).
7. Accessibility & Usability
Strengths:
-
Captions, transcripts, and alternative formats are planned.
-
Course content broken into small, digestible chunks (microlearning), reduces cognitive load.
-
Consistent module structure improves usability.
Areas to Improve:
-
Double-check color contrast and font sizes for readability.
-
Ensure downloadable PDFs are screen-reader compatible.
Overall Summary
My Pottery Fundamentals minicourse meets core OSCQR standards in clarity of objectives, alignment of activities and assessments, learner engagement, and accessibility. It excels at integrating cross-cutting skills (reflection, peer feedback, showcase), and the modular design with microlearning repository supports flexible, learner-centered progression. Next steps for improvement could include adding a brief orientation, providing model submissions, strengthening accessibility checks (contrast/alt text/screen readers), and clarifying workload expectations in more detail.
​
​Check here: OSCQR Evaluation Scorecard PDF
​
​
Final Presentation Screencast
​
​
​Link to screencast here.
​
​​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​

